In May 1989, traveling overland toward the Hindu Kush of northern Pakistan, I had stopped in urban Rawalpindi to catch a van that would take me north to the Karakoram Highway. One morning, stepping out from my modest hotel, I was approached by a young man dressed in a shalwar kameez and a prayer cap carrying a rolled object in his arms. With what seemed like a practiced motion, he quickly unfurled a carpet — this carpet — at my feet and asked what I would offer.
I recognized the piece, broadly, as an Afghan tribal work. At the time, Afghanistan was in the grip of war, and many refugees had crossed into Pakistan. Carpets—portable, durable, and culturally resonant—were among the goods they carried and traded. This one, with its bold geometry, saturated reds, and muted blues, seemed to speak of both tradition and displacement. I quickly made an offer and then found myself carrying a rug back to my room.
The Carpet Itself
This carpet is hand-knotted wool, with a short, resilient pile and a wool foundation. Flip it over and the technical story comes into focus: asymmetrical knots typical of Afghan practice, and a knot density in the range of roughly 100-150 knots per square inch, and slightly depressed warps—all signs, so I’ve read, of village or camp production rather than urban workshop refinement.
Three large medallions stand within the darkened cream field. My research suggests that these have some similarity to Turkmen guls but with adapted motifs. The structure and colour palette align with apparent Ersari Turkmen ethnic traditions, found in Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, and Pakistan. The freer drawing of the medallions suggests Uzbek or mixed village influences—typical of northern Afghan weaving in the late twentieth century. The natural wool ground is supposedly notable, less dense than classical Turkmen all-over patterning.
The colours in this rug are classic vegetable dyes: madder reds, indigo blues, browns and greens drawn from natural dye mixes, and undyed wool. The tones are softened rather than vivid, consistent with age and use—exactly what we might expect from a rug woven in the 1970s or 1980s and acquired in 1989.
Wear and Use
The carpet shows the marks of a working life. Frayed edges and a reduced pile indicate it was used underfoot rather than preserved as a decoration. (I’ve had this rug on the floor of homes in four countries!)
Subtle abrash—the gentle variation in color caused by small-batch dyeing— runs through the whole field, a sign of traditional production rather than factory uniformity.
Context and Continuity
By the late twentieth century, many weavings described as “tribal” were already being produced in settled or semi-settled village or refugee camp contexts, often for sale rather than solely for the weaver’s domestic use. In moments of upheaval, that production had moved with the weavers themselves.
Seen this way, the carpet belongs not just to a particular place, but to a pattern: of human movement, adaptation, and continuity. Designs shift, materials change, and markets intervene, but the practice of weaving persists.
An Object That Remains
Thirty-seven years after my on-the-street Rawalpindi purchase, this piece is more than a souvenir. It is a record of both my journey and broader movements—of people, of craft, and of history carried in wool. The carpet’s wear does not diminish it but gives the thing context.










